PLN#3

In the book "the most dangerous game" Richard Cornnell implies the question is hunting morally rite. In the book a man named Rainsford fell off a yaut into the ocean and came opon an island where he met a Cossack general named Zaroff. When Rainsford first meets Zaroff he was astonished to know that the general knew who he was, because Zaroff addressed him by his own name and knew of his writings. That night Rainsford was having dinner with the general when Zaroff told him about a more greater hunt with better game. Then Rainsford discovered him self in the hunt as the hunt. He is being the hunted by Zaroff. Now that he is the hunted he has a new perspective on hunting and if it is rite. I believe the there is nothing wrong with hunting, without hunting none of us would be here today. In order to get food we use to hunt and kill. People hunting people is a different thing. I personally don't have a problem with it. If you think its is morally wrong to hunt people then what do you think the military is for? The purpose of the military is to break down and destroy everything that society has taut us and how to kill other people just like you and me. Everyone will have their own opinion on this subject but I think that the author was trying to say that it is morally wrong to do and he doesn't believe in hunting.

pln#2

In the book Bryans winter by Gary Paulson a young boy named Bryan finds him self in the Canadian wilderness with nothing to survive with but a hatchet. I think that this is a really good book for any one who loves the out doors. This book shows the struggles and hardships of Bryan as he trys to survive i can relate alot to this book because I have had to go through alot of the same experences as he did. Like makeing a shelter, finding food, and surviveing off the land.